Case report · Clear aligners (Invisalign)
Class III Underbite Treat now or do Surgery?
A teenage boy with a mandibular asymmetry had a growth spurt and grew Class III
- Patient
- Teen (11–20), male
- Classification
- Class III
- Active treatment
- 12 months
- Published
- September 7, 2026

Presentation
Chief complaint. " I have an underbite and the lower teeth are now in front of the top teeth. I don't want to do surgery. I am ok with how I look and just want the teeth to fit together."
Diagnosis. Class III skeletal with a severe mandibular asymmetry to the left with an occlusal cant down to the right. Missing all third molars, Straight profile. Minimal CR/CO Shift present
This patient was comfortable with his facial appearance and wanted his teeth to fit together without jaw surgery. My goal was to respect that preference by improving his bite through orthodontic camouflage, while recognizing that the underlying mandibular asymmetry would remain. Timing was an important part of the plan. His underbite had developed during a mandibular growth spurt, so I deferred treatment until growth had slowed sufficiently. This allowed us to plan the dental correction around a more settled jaw relationship while continuing to monitor residual growth. I chose Invisalign to sequentially distalize the lower teeth, beginning on the right side to address the asymmetric bite. Class III elastics supported the correction as we coordinated the arches and improved the overjet, overbite, and dental relationships. Lower incisor retroclination was an important component of the camouflage. The aim was to position the teeth so they could function together despite the remaining skeletal discrepancy. We achieved a Class I dental relationship with positive overjet and appropriate overbite in 12 months. Some facial asymmetry remained, but the result met his priorities: a functional bite and an appearance he was comfortable with, without surgery. Because residual mandibular growth could affect the correction, I incorporated continued growth monitoring and retainers with Class III elastics as indicated into his retention plan.
Records
Before — Intraoral Photos
After — Intraoral Photos
Before — Lateral Ceph Radiograph
After — Lateral Ceph Radiograph
Before — Panoramic Radiograph
After — Panoramic RadiographMeasurements
| Measure | Norm | Pre | Post |
|---|---|---|---|
| SNA | 82 | 80 | 80 |
| SNB | 80 | 80 | 79 |
| ANB | 2 | 0 | 1 |
| Wits | 0 | -2 | 0 |
| SN-MP | 32 | 33 | 38 |
| U1-SN | 102 | 109 | 107 |
| L1-MP | 90 | 89 | 75 |
| Overjet (mm) | 2–3 | -2 | 2 |
| Overbite (mm) | 2–3 | 2 | 2 |
Treatment
Objectives. Wait until peak mandibular growth has occurred, then distalize the lower right molars to camouflage the mandibular asymmetry.
Plan. Due to the patient’s remaining mandibular growth and underlying Class III/asymmetric growth pattern, defer comprehensive orthodontic treatment until approximately one year after peak mandibular growth has passed and mandibular growth has significantly slowed. Since growth has stabilized sufficiently, we will initiate treatment with the goal of camouflaging the skeletal discrepancy and mandibular asymmetry. Treatment will include: Sequential distalization of the lower molars, beginning on the right side and distalizing the mandibular teeth one at a time to help correct the asymmetric Class III relationship. Bilateral Class III elastics during treatment to assist with anteroposterior correction and support the distalization mechanics. Continue sequential distalization and alignment until the best achievable dental midline, overjet, overbite, and Class I occlusal relationship are obtained within the limits of orthodontic camouflage. Closely monitor facial growth, mandibular position, and occlusion throughout treatment. Retention / Residual Growth Following completion of active treatment, use nighttime Class III elastics in conjunction with retainers during the period of potential residual mandibular growth. The elastics will be used to help maintain the corrected dental relationship and reduce the effect of any remaining Class III growth tendency on the occlusion. Long-term stability will depend in part on the amount and direction of any residual mandibular growth.
Appliances and materials
- Invisalign
- Class III elastics — Cut outs on the L3s and Mesial of the U6s
Progress records

Outcome
We successfully camouflaged the mandibular asymmetry and Class III underbite by sequentially distalizing the lower teeth on the right side. The patient finished with a Class I dental relationship, positive overjet, and appropriate overbite, with good coordination of the upper and lower arches. Mild facial asymmetry remains due to the underlying skeletal asymmetry, but the patient is comfortable with his facial appearance and pleased with the result. Overall, the dental goals were achieved successfully despite the residual skeletal discrepancy. Treatment Summary Treatment duration: 12 months Initial aligners: 47 Refinement: 19 aligners Number of visits: 6 Aligner change interval: Every 7 days
Retention
Fixed retainers: Upper lateral-to-lateral (U2–2) and lower canine-to-canine (L3–3). Essix retainers: Fabricated with Class III elastic slits. Continue nighttime retainer wear with Class III elastics as indicated through approximately age 18 while residual mandibular growth is monitored. Reassess growth and occlusion approximately every 6–10 months and adjust retention or elastic wear if needed.
Case reports are shared with patient authorisation. Individual results vary.